Search for: "State v. Sessions"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 5,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2011, 5:54 pm
The recent case of Stansberry v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 2:02 pm
” Under the Final Rule, the voluntary-recognition bar prevents employees from filing for decertification for a minimum of six months and a maximum of one year from the date of the first bargaining session, and removes the 45-day window for the employees in the minority to be able to seek an election to challenge the representation. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
Leahy opens today's session, sounding slightly less burbly. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm
The proposal should state your name, the name of your law school, the Section for which you are submitting, the title of the poster, an actual electronic copy of the poster itself and a description of what you will be presenting. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
HHJ Birss QC took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
As Professor Coffee discusses in his article, in order to address these issues, the district court in Campo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm
This Ibero-American Convention conceives videoconferencing as a resource that enhances and expedites cooperation between the competent authorities of the signatory States. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
This bill is aimed at religiously affiliated institutions, noting (in language that would not be codified) the Legislature’s agreement with Justice Alito in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am
While the Guidelines are no longer mandatory and federal judges have far more sentencing discretion since the United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Creed - "My Own Prison" ("A court is in session / A verdict is in / No appeal on the docket today / Just my own sin. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am
General Assembly, Eleventh Emergency Special Session, 4th Plenary Meeting, Representative of Bosnia-Herzegovina Sven Alkalaj compares his country’s genocide to the situation in Ukraine: “What can be the message of the ambassador of Bosnia-Herzegovina, the country that suffered aggression, the brutal occupation for almost 4 years facing the arms trade embargo, where genocide was committed three decades ago, and almost half of the population was brutally killed, displaced, or… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Each infusion session lasts from 30 minutes to several hours. [read post]
1 May 2025, 6:00 am
His presentation was entitled Energy Bills in the Texas Legislative Session. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
Are you trying to say you'd have joined Justice Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
