Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 5561 - 5580 of 16,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:48 am by David Russcol
On January 29, the Supreme Judicial Court in Mui v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:48 am by David Russcol
On January 29, the Supreme Judicial Court in Mui v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
”  McGahn may be accurate in stating that the President sought the agencies’ “input. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
”  McGahn may be accurate in stating that the President sought the agencies’ “input. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In a class action lawsuit alleging that Tinder discriminated on the basis of age in violation of California state laws by charging consumers age 30 and over a higher price for Tinder Plus subscriptions, the California Court of Appeal recently reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of Tinder, holding there was no strong public policy that justified the allegedly discriminatory pricing model. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie hopes that in Janus v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 8:43 am by Eugene Volokh
If the State cannot proffer evidence establishing both the law's strong public-interest justification and its close fit to this end, the law must be held unconstitutional.... [read post]