Search for: "Study v. State" Results 5561 - 5580 of 15,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 8:36 am by Steven Cohen
AN INFANT BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, TANJA BRUESTLE-KUMRA v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am by Joe Consumer
  I’ve had Presidents of the United States attack me - by name! [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:55 pm
The Court likely soon will consider a petition to review a challenge to a state law authorizing execution as punishment for a nonfatal sexual assault on a child, Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Yesterday, at the State of the Net conference in Washington DC, a report by the ‘Internet Safety Technical Task Force‘ was launched. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:35 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The attempted sale took place at the 40th annual New York International Numismatic Convention.A past New York prosecution involving cultural artifacts is the famous case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am by Sam Wieczorek
  When not making physician calls, PSRs will study Glaxo products and relevant disease states. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Creech (1993)), let States limit the uses juries make of mitigation (Graham v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
As a preliminary matter, the court stated that FDA need not conduct an empirical study on the efficacy of a disclaimer before an outright banning of a claim if there is either no evidence to support the claim, or the evidence in support of the claim is qualitatively weaker than evidence against the claim. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Jesner v. [read post]