Search for: "*u. S. v. Price"
Results 541 - 560
of 873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:51 am
The story highlights the fact that advertising restraints (like other types of competition restraints, such as relating to price, output, etc.) can be insulated from competition challenges when they are lodged in valid provincial or federal legislation (based on Canada’s “regulated conduct doctrine”). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:37 am
However, references to U-Haul v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
U. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 8:18 am
This screenshot was taken with yesterday’s close so you’ll see the closing price and date on the next line. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 8:56 am
For example, in R. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:30 am
The Act contains criminal and civil provisions relating to, among other things, conspiracy agreements (price-fixing, market division/allocation and supply/output restriction agreements between competitors), bid-rigging, false or misleading representations, refusals to deal, price maintenance, exclusive dealing, tied selling, market restrictions, and abuse of dominance. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
Dukes, 564 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
The Act contains criminal and civil provisions relating to, among other things, conspiracy agreements (price-fixing, market division/allocation and supply/output restriction agreements between competitors), bid-rigging, false or misleading representations, refusals to deal, price maintenance, exclusive dealing, tied selling, market restrictions, and abuse of dominance. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:18 pm
L’anza Research Int’l, Inc., 523 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
AutoDesk) Wiley Publishing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:23 am
Levinson, 485 U. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:33 am
The Ninth Circuit has stated that '[u]nlike novel scientific theories, a jury should be able to determine whether asserted technical deficiencies undermine a survey’s probative value.'. . . [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:16 pm
Levinson, 485 U. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
Levinson, 485 U. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
In Adams & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
