Search for: ". OD"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
”The proprietor’s statement referred to in the OD’s decision that the majority of strains produce cytochrome d had been challenged by the [opponent] in its response to the statement of grounds of appeal (letter of 9 September 2011). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the board agrees with the patentee’s statement in his notice of appeal that “the skilled person would have to choose from a variety of known approaches and the OD’s assumption of a one-way street situation is not correct”.Furthermore, both approaches A) and B) have the advantage over the approach used in the patent that no additional layer is required, which is consistent with the declared goal of D8 of a straightforward manufacturing process. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a petition for review of decision T 808/11 of Board of Appeal (BoA) 3.5.03, which had dismissed the patent proprietor’s appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the patent in amended form.During the oral proceedings (OPs), the Board had raised a clarity objection, in response to which the patent proprietor filed new auxiliary requests. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
The most rapid growth is expected in fluorinated GHGs (HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) which are expected to increase by more than 60 percent between 2005 and 2020, driven by increasing use of HFCs as 6 substitutes for ODS. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
However, it is not necessary to go into the issue further since in reality it is not disputed that auxiliary requests III.2 and III.3 could have been presented before the OD. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:52 pm
I. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:15 am
” His ode to that city, Here Is New York, did the same, garnering universal praise for condensing the strange poetry of Manhattan into just 7,500 words. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
”The request filed before the OD is encompassed by the expression “the requests filed so far”. [read post]
I think (I'm a company), therefore I am? EPO Enlarged Board seeks comments on resuscitated companies
6 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
The Opposition Division (OD) allowed an amended version of the patent. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
In this case the Opposition Division (OD) maintained the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
(my emphasis)In what follows, Board 3.3.04 examines compliance with A 123(2):*** Translation of the German original ***Substantial law[2] The Board notes that the present main request is based on the first auxiliary request which had been filed during the oral proceedings before the Opposition Division (OD) on February 7, 2008. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It is identical to the main request underlying the decision of the opposition division (OD) […].[2.1] According to Article 13(1) RPBA […] any amendment to a party’s case after it has filed its grounds of appeal or reply may be admitted and considered at the board’s discretion. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
”Thus, the mere fact that the opposition was filed by a patent attorney, even if he might be representing a third party, does not necessarily mean that there has been a circumvention of the law by abuse of process which might render the opposition inadmissible.[1.3] Following a failure to comply with R 76(2)(a) and R 41(2)(c), R 77(2) gives the opposition division (OD) the authority to invite the opponent to remedy the deficiencies and – if the opponent fails to do so… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In this case the opponents appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) – dated April 19, 2010 – to maintain the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 as maintained by the Opposition Division (OD) read:1. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In this case only the opponent appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:12 am
"Otrosi.Net", la revista online del Colegio de Abogados de Madrid publicó esta importante jurisprudencia, la cual se trascribe, asi como los antecedentes del caso explicados con claridad y que nos permite verificar en la práctica las importantes diferencias entre la extradición y la Eurorden, en especial la posibilidad de solicitar la revisión de sentencia que se viene contemplando en la jurisprudencia de nuestras Salas Penales Supremas.Fuente:… [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Your writing may not be as bad as you think. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Your writing may not be as bad as you think. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case neither the impugned decision nor the minutes of the OPs before the OD contain indications regarding the new ground for opposition or its dismissal, so that it is not clear according to which criteria the OD has exercised its discretion. [read post]
