Search for: "ACE LTD"
Results 541 - 560
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
Discusses AG v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 418 (Admin). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Later, a company called Goform Ltd was set up to run the vineyard. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
The doctrine has been approved by the High Court of Australia: Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479; [1906] HCA 88; Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30; [1988] HCA 25. [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Ablaise Ltd. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
Warby J referred to the leading case of Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1995] 2 AC 65 in which an article concerning two characters from the TV series “Neighbours” appeared to be photographed having sex with each other. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm
In upholding the first instance decision, Dingemans LJ reiterated the principles to finding malice from Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
. _____________________________________ 2 Théberge v Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc, 2002 SCC 34 at para 30. 3 CCH Canadian v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13 at para 16 [CCH]. 4 King Features Syndicate Inc v O and M Kleeman Ltd, [1941] AC 417 HL; Hawkes & Son (Lon- don) Ltd v Paramount Film Service Ltd, [1934] 1 Ch 593 [Hawkes & Son]. 5 We note in passing that choreography is similarly a performance-based media, realized through… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
This was regardless of the extent of the demise (Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner [1977] QB 823). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
Standard works (Kennedy's CIF Contracts) and decisions [Johnson v Taylor Bros (1920) AC 144, 155] recognise the following as features of CIF contractsCIF contracts relate to carriage of goods by sea. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
(This post is written by Chen Zhi, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Macau, a trainee lawyer in Mainland China) The arbitration-favored policy has been adopted by many jurisdictions across the world in recent years, as the support of arbitration by local judiciaries has been viewed as an important standard for gauging the business environment of a jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
The first case to be taken up by US Courts on the issue of reverse engineering was: Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
Second Circuit Sacks Email Notice of Post-Transaction Terms – http://bit.ly/Pn6RNn (Jeff Neuburger) Iran Announces Plan To Launch Domestic Internet By March 2013 (And To Block Google Today) – http://tcrn.ch/Qctas2 (Anthony Ha) Legal Project Management 2.0: The Pressure to Perform and the Mandate to Deliver - http://bit.ly/Pn6D8V (Pam Woldow) NLRB Invalidates Costco’s Social Media Policy - http://bit.ly/P5U2a3 (Hunton Williams) Personal Data Overhaul… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Proof allowed in Heather Capital case. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
Let us take, for example, the leading case of Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457, concerning a well known model with a drug problem. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Ltd. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Cause of action In Foley v Independent Newspapers Ltd [1994] 2 ILRM 61, 67, Geoghegan J held that once the competing constitutional rights are balanced, the plaintiff’s entitlement to succeed under the ordinary laws of libel was unaffected. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am
Likewise, when the aircraft is in any country that is a signatory to the Berne Convention, the WIPO Copyright Treaty or the TRIPS Agreement, this amounts to public performance and/or communication to the public of that work within the meaning of corresponding provisions enacted in that country.The matter at hand; Jurisdiction QA accepted that it had been served in the UK therefore the UK High Court has jurisdiction, but applied for an order under CPR rule 11(1) that this court should not… [read post]
