Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 2:28 pm
He filed a drug defect case against Teva and Actavis, which are the two companies that made the generic drugs he took, and Wyeth, the maker of Reglan. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Product hopping was recently in the news with New York state's antitrust suit against Actavis for its decision to withdraw Namenda IR, its 2x/day Alzheimer's drug (with patent protection ending July 2015), to force patients to switch to Namenda XR, a 1x/day version (with patent protection until 2029). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
This was Andrew’s characterisation of the riddle faced by Birss J in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:03 am
The Court of Appeal heard arguments regarding whether, if they had accepted Kymab's construction of "in situ replacement", they could nevertheless have found infringement on the basis of Actavis v Eli Lilly (Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48, IPKat post). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis; the Court of Appeal has its say on second medical use claims in the UKIPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that, earlier this year, Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means [see blog posts here and here]. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
In 2015, readers could see him put his mental martial arts to test in AP Racing v Alcon [2015] EWHC 1371, Warner-Lambert v Actavis on behalf of the Highland Health Board [2015] EWHC 72 and Global Flood Defence System v Van den Noort Innovations [2015] EWHC 153. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
In her comment Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World, InternKat Rose analyses this recent case to determine whether Lord Kitchin approached any of the unresolved issues left in the Actavis v Eli Lilly case.CopyrightLast year The IPKat reported on two new important referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from Germany. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Last week the Court of Appeal said that was incorrect in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and that actually all that is required is for the infringer to know, or be able to reasonably foresee, that the medicament would be used to treat the condition (Katpost here). [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Notably, Mr Justice Arnold considered the principles of insufficiency established by Warner-Lambert v Actavis applicable, even though the use of the antibody to treat psoriasis was a first medical use. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The post discusses the reasons for the unanimous conclusions reached in the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48 case.As the news about Google’s paid research was on all the headlines all around the World, Kat Nicola gave her own critical insight on the news on: The Smoking Gun - Is IP research the next tobacco scandal? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:58 pm
Guest Posts We received two interesting and informative guest posts on the Myriad and Actavis cases. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:15 am
It applies to 14 lots of fentanyl patches sold in the United States by Actavis South Atlantic, formerly known as Abrika Pharmaceuticals. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:45 am
This is a particularly interesting one for the IPKat, because it was his announcement of the referral being made back in May 2008 that apparently resulted in an unusual postscript being added to the Court of Appeal's judgment in Actavis v Merck (IPKat commentary here, decision in full here). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:23 am
The product is manufactured for Actavis by Corium International in the United States.RECOMMENDATION: Wholesalers and retailers are being asked to return the product they have on hand or in stock. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:31 am
He also represented Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. in its $5.9 billion purchase of Swiss drug maker Actavis Inc., which was approved by the FTC (with divestitures) earlier in October. [read post]
