Search for: "ADOPTION OF N. B." Results 541 - 560 of 2,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Thus, in concluding that the election of a minority of the directors was a "threat" to B&N, the Chancery Court noted that "[o]nce an insurgent has won one election, the incumbent board majority's ability to be intransigent in the face of stockholder sentiment is greatly limited. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:15 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  The last volume addressed the following topics:  Cyril NOURISSAT : La Cour de justice face aux règlements de coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale Bénédicte VASSALLO : La réception en France des décisions étrangères d’adoption George A. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 7:27 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For years, the National Taxpayer Advocate advocated that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) adopt a Taxpayer Bill of Rights and the IRS finally did so in 2014. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 276 n.23 (2003) (racial preference that violated the Constitution also violated 42 U.S.C. 1981). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
The Commission expects that the officer providing the certification will rely in part on the review of the assets underlying the ABS that an issuer must undergo in order to meet the requirements of recently adopted Rule 193.[11] B. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
N/A The term “Large” applies to a company or, where that company is a parent of a consolidated group, a group meeting two of the following tests: (a) balance sheet total exceeding EUR 20 million; (b) net turnover exceeding EUR 40 million; and (c) more than 250 employees. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
N/A The term “Large” applies to a company or, where that company is a parent of a consolidated group, a group meeting two of the following tests: (a) balance sheet total exceeding EUR 20 million; (b) net turnover exceeding EUR 40 million; and (c) more than 250 employees. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
App. 2006); In re C.R.H., 29 P.3d 849, 854 n.24 (Alaska 2001); In re J.L.A., 2007 Kan. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
It offers a Franco-English perspective on Article 5-1, b, of the Brussels I Regulation (L’article 5, 1, b dans la jurisprudence franco-britannique, ou le droit comparé au secours des compétences spéciales du règlement (CEE) n °  44/2001). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:49 am by Doug Cornelius
  The court adopted a standard that an allegation that an adviser charged excessive fees for advisory services does not state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under § 36(b), unless the adviser also misled the fund’s board of directors in obtaining their approval of the compensation. [read post]