Search for: "APPLICATION OF SMITH"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8, in which the Court will determine when a local authority sells land which is subject to a statutory trust for public recreational purposes without complying with the relevant statutory requirements, does that trust continue or end? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:32 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor the bill and any future developments in the digital accessibility space [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:32 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor the bill and any future developments in the digital accessibility space [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
I will be presenting a paper on the evolution of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the conflict between free exercise and free speech claims on one hand and neutral, “generally applicable” laws like anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm
Reed Smith will continue to track developments related to this proposed rule, including its potential finalization later this year. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:56 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
‘822 – “…shown on the form of application”. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Reed Smith will continue to follow updates with regard to CMS and its application of the retroactive-rulemaking powers. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Lindsey Graham, Case 22-12696 (11th Cir. 2022), denial of application for stay and an injunction pending appeal by Supreme Court (Nov. 1, 2022). [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm
Please do not hesitate to reach out to the authors of this post or your regular Reed Smith contact if you have any questions about the FCA or the conference. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In… [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 7:23 pm
Reed Smith will continue to track developments on the regulation of Rural Emergency Hospitals as a provider type. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
The fact that this will require an employer to take down a sign reading "White Applicants Only" hardly means that the law should be analyzed as one regulating the employer's speech rather than conduct. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
The hearing raised several other shortcomings of U.S. law on atrocities (including clarifying the extraterritorial applicability of the Alien Tort Statute, the subject of another proposed bill last session that did not advance). [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:46 am
We believe it has numerous applications that will save significant time and cost,” said Beth Patterson, director at ESPConnect and project trustee. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 7:32 pm
It also states, “the information collection request does not collect all information relevant to Part B drugs, as Part B drugs may not be selected for negotiation until initial price applicability year 2028…. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Smith, 351 N.C. 251, 267, 524 S.E.2d 28, 40 (poisoning), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 862, 148 L. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: This Essay, prepared for the Iowa Law Review’s 2022 Symposium on the Future of Free Exercise, argues that religious exemptions to generally applicable law (or overly generous ‘most favored nation’ interpretations of the concept of religious discrimination which amount in practice to exemptions) should not be extended to members of faith groups with sufficient political, economic, or social power to defend themselves in the democratic process. [read post]
