Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 541 - 560
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Akhil Amar showed in The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction how originalism leads to incorporation of the Bill of Rights. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
Constitution (Oxford 2013) Louis Michael Seidman, On Constitutional Disobedience (Oxford 2012) 2012 (Fall): Gerard Magliocca, John Bingham: America's Founding Son (NYU, 2013) (assigned ms) Akhil Reed Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution (Basic Books, 2012) John Inazu, Liberty's Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (Yale 2012) Justice Antonin Scalia, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (West, 2012) Abner Greene, Against Obligation (Harvard 2012)… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
11].Footnote 11 offers some examples of what the court apparently sees as the generally correct approach to the original public meaning inquiry:11 On this aspect of originalist interpretive method as applied to the Second Amendment, see generally AKHIL REED AMAR, THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION 215–30, 257–67 (1998); Brannon P. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
Put a different way, the new federal government created the possibility of a "tyranny gap" (to use an expression of my friend Akhil Amar). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen and I have a new draft article: The Sweep and Force of Section Three, that is forthcoming in the Pennsylvania Law Review. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Constitution (Oxford 2013) Louis Michael Seidman, On Constitutional Disobedience (Oxford 2012) 2012 (Fall): Gerard Magliocca, John Bingham: America's Founding Son (NYU, 2013) (assigned ms) Akhil Reed Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution (Basic Books, 2012) John Inazu, Liberty's Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (Yale 2012) Justice Antonin Scalia, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (West, 2012) Abner Greene, Against Obligation (Harvard 2012)… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm
Unfortunately, like Akhil Amar and Laurence Tribe, the Times failed to address the actual objections being made by the plaintiffs and the actual reasoning of Judge Roger Vinson. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
And Professor Akhil Amar has written that, because "the very phrase 'substantive due process' teeters on self-contradiction, it does not give us a sound starting point, or a directional push to proper legal analysis. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Stephen Griffin has posted some very perceptive and illuminating comments about Semantic Originalism at Balkinization. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
This facet itself of the Constitution forces us to realize that “fixity” may be a sometime thing, though, tellingly, the defense of Article VII must take the form either of an Ackermanian justified illegality or, as argued instead by his colleague Akhil Reed Amar, an assertion that the “confederation” announced in the Articles, including the strictures of Article XIII, had in effect been dissolved by the utter failure, for example, to elicit sufficient… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Danielle Allen, Akhil Amar, Randy Barnett, Charles Barzun, William Ewald, Jonathan Gienapp, Aaron Knapp, Maeva Marcus, Michael McConnell, Eric Nelson, Nicholas Pedersen, Emily Sneff, William Treanor, Derek Webb, Jesse Wegman, and John Witt are among those who have written extensively on Wilson, or who are writing books on him or in which he plays a major role. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It is the only case, for example, that is printed unedited in the casebook that Jack and I co-edit, along with Akhil Amar and Reva Siegel, and I have conducted courses at both Harvard and the University of Texas in which the case was read aloud—and discussed—in its entirety over a twelve to fifteen hour period of classes. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
” One of the points that Jack Balkin and I make in the casebook we edit, along with Akhil Reed Amar, Reva Siegel, and Christina Rodriguez, is that much valuable discussion of the Constitution occurs outside the judiciary, whether in other institutions like the presidency or Congress, in mass social movements such as the “New Departure” advocated by many women after the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, or individuals such as Frederick Douglass. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:35 am
Las razones para la selección de ese sistema son diversas y debatibles pero en síntesis, el experto en derecho constitucional, Akhil Reed Amar, señala las siguientes: (A) El federalismo: El colegio electoral fue un balance entre estados pequeños y grades; esclavistas y no esclavistas. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Professor Akhil Amar has argued that these other rights are safe under Dobbs's historical test or an independent constitutional ground, like equal protection. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Even the leading academic supporters of Obamacare’s constitutionality, such as Yale law professors Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin, use the term, as did Time magazine’s managing editor Richard Stengel in his recent cover story about the Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
The brief was signed by 16 professors, including Akhil Amar, Richard Fallon, Dan Farber, Phil Frickey, Sandy Levinson, Judith Resnick, Kathleen Sullivan, and Laurence Tribe. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
For more on double jeopardy, read: Amar, Akhil Reed. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
Access to “compulsory process” in criminal cases is so fundamental that it is included in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, along with a defendant’s rights to counsel, speedy and public trial, notice of charges, and confrontation with witnesses (Amar, 2005; 331). [read post]
