Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 541 - 560
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
I am very pleased to be a guest on Balkinization. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:29 am
But here is where I am a die-hard lover of federalism: As dumb as employer mandates are, centralizing debate over health care through a broad construction of ERISA preemption is even dumber. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
The case especially discussed is San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
Hoang v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Am. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:45 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:44 am
United States, 128 S.Ct. 586 (2007). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:03 pm
I am not sure that this is a desirable outcome: When national mass-mail outfits (NARAL, the NRA, etc) battle it out in a state, the states are arguably transformed into echo chambers for D.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
Once again, I am indebted to Magistrate Marcia Linsky of the Allen County (Indiana) Superior Court for an interesting new decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
Q: Where do I get a copy of Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
Special requirements for employees engaged on Federal or State contracts and grants The Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D) and the State Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 require that University employees directly engaged in the performance of work on a Federal or State contract or grant shall abide by this Policy as a condition of employment. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:50 am
The Great Turnback of grants and regulatory discretion to the states was a product of two former governors -- Reagan and Clinton -- with such notable (or infamous, if you are so inclined) measures as TANF, expansion of section 1115 Medicaid waivers, Lopez/Morrison/Gonzales v Oregon judicial vindication of state power, etc. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:41 am
The second is based on the facts of several preembryo disposition dispute cases faced by several state Supreme Courts, see, e.g., A.Z. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
As the New Jersey Supreme Court stated more than 25 years ago in Francis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Back then, he was the man in charge, the Alpha Law Dude, finger on the pulse, etc. etc. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
But then, I am not sure he cares. [read post]
