Search for: "Anderson v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2017, 10:30 am by MBettman
Also taking second place for the third year in a row is Anderson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Thus, in a Presidential election, a State’s enforcement of more stringent ballot access requirements, including filing deadlines, has an impact beyond its own borders.It bears noting, however, that 17 years after Anderson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCourtney Anderson, Georgia State University College of Law Medha D. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
At that point, Soto-Perez called the Crimes Against Children Unit (CACU) and Det. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Belize Three government officials have to pay defamation damages of $5,000 to Chief Pharmacist, Sharon Anderson after comments they made about her. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
Simpson & Marwick are also known to have represented numerous Scottish local authorities in expensive and long running litigation cases.With connections between the judiciary and law firms now in the news and of a public interest nature, records also show Clyde & Co, who merged with Simpson & Marwick – has among it’s partners a serving judge – Sheriff Peter Anderson.Sheriff Anderson’s biography on the Clyde & Co website states the following:… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Taylor Daily
” By contrast, Trump implied support for the Assad regime and Russia in order to combat ISIS, as well as for updates to the United States’ nuclear arsenal. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which is scheduled for oral argument next Tuesday, maintaining that “there is no Double Jeopardy problem in this case” because “Bravo-Fernandez isn’t an inconsistent verdicts case at all. [read post]