Search for: "Answers Corporation"
Results 541 - 560
of 17,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2013, 8:47 pm
The simple answer is that immigration laws are complex and the bureaucratic rules interpreting them are too often ambiguous or impractical and therefore difficult to honor or to prosecute. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:51 pm
In my forthcoming book, I offer an affirmative answer to that question. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:16 am
ANSWER: No. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:20 am
Usually I tell them that the answer lies in their ownership interests, their control of the board of directors, and their rights under their partner or shareholder buy-sell agreement. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:20 pm
The answer lies in the mandate the investor - whether it's a business development group, a specially-designated ventures unit, or a fund with a corporate LP - has been given by its corporation.Many corporate investors are not driven by the need to generate venture capital level returns (although it woudl be pleasant). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:55 am
” But Sapirstein did not amend his pleading as an answer / petition. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 9:27 pm
I invite any insurance agent or broker for HOAs to enlighten me because I do not know the answer to the question. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 12:47 pm
She wants the largest corporations in the United States to be legally answerable to people other than their shareholders, and she's introducing a bill to force it. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
The answer is nowhere. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:12 am
I don't have the answer but do find it curious that these corporations pay their executives a handsome salary! [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:23 pm
Allen Stanford in a $7 billion fraud scheme to be treated as brokerage customers by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:35 am
Armed with the detailed criteria laid-out in the 2017 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, companies can now be better prepared to answer tough questions about their compliance program. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
The answer has to do with new technologies – especially the railroad – requiring vast amounts of capital, the advantages such large firms derived from economies of scale, the emergence of limited liability that made it practicable to raise large sums from numerous passive investors, and the rise of professional management. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
The Seventh Circuit doesn’t answer this question, though it seems its answer would have to turn on whether or not the shareholders in question were in the majority—a result that seems both counterintuitive and at odds with the Supreme Court’s approach to dissenters’ rights in other context, including the union dues context. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 8:32 am
ThyssenKrupp Corporation, et al., C.A. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
One answer is increased public regulation. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
So my answer is essentially yes to all of your questions. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
So my answer is essentially yes to all of your questions. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:11 pm
Real Party in Interest, Adam Hohnbaum, has filed his consolidated answer to amicus curiae briefs. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
The strategy is intended to underpin the firm's commitment to upgrade the merged entity's corporate practice in the City without being restricted by legacy Lovells' lockstep. [read post]
