Search for: "Any Future Defendants" Results 541 - 560 of 26,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 2:50 pm
Cases being heard presently are to be considered a mistrial and the proceedings will have to begin again sometime in the near future, this time around with the accusers in plain view of the defendant. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm by Michael Lumer
There doesn't appear to be any dispute that Leveridge did the deed with the defendant. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:50 am
Subsequent police investigations and observations of the defendant failed to yield evidence of any illegal activity by the defendant. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
., the defendant won a summary judgment motion, before hearing any class certification motion was heard. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Let’s unpack the separate opinions and their implications for the future of administrative law. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:53 am
The Supreme Court decision stated that the insurance company must defend the doctor in the malpractice suit and allowed the counterclaim by the company against the doctor for unpaid premiums open for future resolution. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm
When confronted, the defendant allegedly appeared "intoxicated" and refused to let the agents look at any computers, The next day the defendant dialed 211, a telephone crisis helpline, and said he wanted to hang himself. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:46 am by Docket Navigator
Further, Defendants have not shown that they have suffered any commercial harm as a result of the violation. . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:27 am by emagraken
 Lutzke’s entitlement to damages for: (a) future loss of income earning capacity, including future pension benefits; and (b) the cost of future care. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:29 am by Liisa Speaker
   “Therefore, because plaintiff reported a suspected future violation of a law, not a suspected existing violation, plaintiff did not engage in ‘protected activity’ for purposes of the WPA, regardless of her deposition testimony pertaining to her subjective belief at the time of her report to [the defendant],” the Supreme Court wrote. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:27 am by S2KM Limited
The anticipated shortfalls resulting from the liquidation of Executive Life of New York (ELNY) are expected to total $920,641,977 on a present value basis - assuming promised state guarantee association payments and enhancements but prior to any possible payments from the ELNY Hardship Fund and/or from structured settlement defendants who negotiated and promised to pay future periodic payments funded with ELNY annuities. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Abbott, 23-13Issue: Whether nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel can be applied to make the results of a handful of unrepresentative bellwether trials binding on the defendant in all pending and future cases in a multi-district litigation. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Completion of the program will not be deemed a conviction for the purpose of any future prosecution. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:43 am
The defendant's ex-wife also testified on his behalf as the two have a mentally disabled daughter that the defendant cares for and supports. [read post]
Forum-selection clauses are common, and highly useful, features of commercial contracts because they help make any future litigation on a contract more predictable for the parties and, in some cases, less expensive. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
Continuing on from our discussion yesterday, medical malpractice, like any other negligence tort, is proven by showing: (1) the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff to act a certain way, (2) that the defendant breached that duty, (3) that the defendant’s breach caused the plaintiff harm and (4) that the harm caused is compensable under the law. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
Some of you are probably wondering if the same jurisdictional defect applies to any of the 250+ other defendants. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:44 am by Howard Friedman
First, that injunction does not require any county clerk to cease future enforcement of Proposition 8. [read post]