Search for: "Application of Thomas"
Results 541 - 560
of 8,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas joined the majority opinion. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 10:32 am
Anyway… While the discussion between Thomas and William follows the typical “software patent discussion framework”(TM) of outrage, more outrage, denial, and chest thumping about how “Person X, Y, Z” came up with the idea 1, 2, 4 or 100 years ago… I was pleased to notice that William and Thomas actually took some time to thoughtfully discuss what Yahoo was trying to do with its patent applications and how they fit in with the overall… [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:01 am
The circuit court reversed the county’s determination, finding that none of the relevant parties was an “applicant” for purposes of a vesting decision under Ordinance 823 and that Steven and Thomas were not “claimants that filed a claim under Ballot Measure 37,” as required by section 5(3) of Measure 49. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
Thus no one is saying that Thomas is wrong. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:24 pm
Justice Thomas Kilbride dissented. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
4/11/2011 Guest: David Post International Global Internet Freedom This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
Thomas stated, "There was no support for the argument then and there is no support now". [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:35 pm
Justice Thomas R. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 11:15 am
Australian cricket captain Ricky Ponting has lodged an application (set for hearing in the Federal Court on 8 February 2008) claiming misleading and deceptive conduct against the operator of a website which described itself as "the official Ricky Ponting site": Ricky Thomas Ponting v Kevin Leonard Consulting Pty Limited (ACN 087 382 858) & Anor (also see Computerworld story) It is not clear why Ricky Ponting has chosen litigation rather than the domain name… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:14 am
Robert Thomas reports that the justices are questioning Isaac Hall about the application of Bulgo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
Smith when it ruled that the Free Exercise Clause provides no exemption from burdens on religious conscience resulting from neutral and generally applicable laws? [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:34 am
Circuit hearing oral argument in the case today consists of Circuit Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Thomas B. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
The search will fill a position held by Thomas Zgambo for the past seven years. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Alito dissents for Thomas and Gorsuch. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Jones: Fourth Amendment Applicability in the 21st Century - Thomas K. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:21 pm
The Thomas More Law Center issued a press release announcing the decision. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:38 pm
rédigé par Thomas Saint-Aubin, chef du bureau de la stratégie éditoriale du ministère de la Justice : « Le droit des données publiques est a priori compatible avec les licences libres. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:19 am
Justice Thomas would have granted what was an application for stay of mandate and injunction pending review.Justice Kavanaugh wrote a statement that began: The Court of Appeals suggested that a former President may not successfully invoke the Presidential communications privilege for communications that occurred during his Presidency, at least if the current President does not support the privilege claim. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
Although during a pandemic, the ordinary constitutional test of strict scrutiny may not apply to the Governor’s regulation of church activities (although it is still argued here in Count I), the government’s regulations must still be “capable of a reasoned application” as they would be for a non-public forum....Thomas More Society issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Thomas, (ED KY, filed 11/22/2016), asserts both facial and as-applied challenges contending that the denial of the license-plate application amounts to content and viewpoint-based discrimination. [read post]
