Search for: "Arizona v. California"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
California should be overruled. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
The cases to be heard — consolidated for one hour of oral argument (probably in March) — are Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
District Courts in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, and Washington; state high courts in Alabama, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Washington, and West Virginia; and state appellate courts in Florida, Missouri, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am
Arizona, a challenge to Arizona’s death-penalty scheme and the death penalty nationwide, and to rule that “the overbroad death penalty is no longer constitutional in Arizona and, indeed, in all capital states. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
The court cites to Calder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court held in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
In Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 6:02 am
The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:25 pm
Arizona Department of Corrections, 2011 U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Further evidence of the breadth of the controversy is that Hibdon has also sued residents of Arizona, North Carolina, Texas and New Hampshire relating to postings those individuals made on rec.sport.jetski.FN5 FN5 The Memorandum Opinion entered on May 14, 2003 in the case of Hibdon v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Attorneys for the prisoners in Tennessee, Arizona and California argued before U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
I tried to tell them that the Arizona/California method of requiring the jury to be unanimous one way or the other was the way to go, and they blew me off. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
A California federal district court held that plaintiff had alleged viable Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection and RLUIPA claims, but not a free exercise violation.In Marr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed Bennett v. [read post]
