Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 541 - 560 of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Arnold, Judge.Representing Appellant Boyer-Gladden: Bernie Q. [read post]
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
This is the second of three blogs examining the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco[1]. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:42 am
This Kat was travelling last week when Mr Justice Arnold handed down the decision in HTC Corporation v Nokia ([2013] EWHC 3247 (Pat)), and has only now had a chance to read it. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
 In that decision, Arnold J concluded that there is no single meaning rule for trade marks. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am by Florian Mueller
And on Friday (December 6), the Munich I Regional Court will announce a ruling on a German Nokia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
·        The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances·        Amendments to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 made by the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) Regulations 2014, the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Disability) Regulations 2014, the Copyright (Public Administration) Regulations 2014, the Copyright and Rights and… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
According to the Appellate Division, First Department, claiming someone is “connected” is not slanderous.In July 2005, Philip Galasso supposedly removed trees and a fence from Arnold Saltzman’s property. [read post]