Search for: "B RICHARDSON" Results 541 - 560 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
HCSM Definition The proposed regulations draw their definition of a “health care sharing ministry” from section 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the Code, which provides that the individual shared responsibility payment (which is zero after December 31, 2018) does not apply to an individual who is a member of a health care sharing ministry. as an organization. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
§ 921(a)(20)(B), means “capable of being punished by a term of imprisonment of two years or less,” or “subject to a term of imprisonment of two years or less. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Trinity Lutheran is a member of the community too, and the State’s decision to exclude it for purposes of this public program must withstand the strictest scrutiny … b. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:49 am by Michael Lowe
Perhaps you recognize Dallas-area cities like Addison, Balch Springs, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Cockrell Hill, Combine, Coppell, Dallas, Desoto, Duncanville, Farmers Branch, Garland, Grand Prairie, Glenn Heights, Highland Park, Hutchins, Irving, Lancaster, Mesquite, Richardson, Rowlett, Sachse, Seagoville, Sunnyvalle, University Park or Wilmer. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
§ 3663A(b)(4) covers costs for reimbursement under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act that were “neither required nor requested” by the government, including costs incurred for the victim’s own purposes and unprompted by any official government action. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For instance:  The changes in 29 CFR 4006.5(f)(3), which deal with premium proration for short plan years where the plan’s assets are distributed in a termination, are applicable to plan years beginning in or after 2020;   The changes in 29 CFR 4010.7(a)(2), § 4010.9(b)(2), and § 4010.11(a)(1)(i), which deal with identifying legal relationships of controlled group members, consolidated financial statements, and calculating the funding… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
This post is the fourth of a five-part series on litigation about mail voting during the 2020 general election. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle: (Ars… [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:30 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Justice and the North Carolina Attorney General against North Carolina’s largest healthcare system, The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Atrium Health (“Atrium”) which challenges steering restrictions and other contractual protections of Atrium against competition from other contracted health care providers. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To resolve and avoid the potential Civil Monetary Penalties that HIPAA could authorize OCR to impose for the alleged Privacy Rule violation, MHHS agrees in the Resolution Agreement to pay OCR a $2.4 million monetary settlement and implement a corrective action plan that obligates MHHS to update and train its workforce on its policies and procedures on safeguarding PHI from impermissible uses and disclosures including specific instructions and procedures to: Address (a) Uses and disclosures for which… [read post]