Search for: "BARNES v. DEFENSE "
Results 541 - 560
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 7:06 am
In Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:46 pm
He wanted to argue self-defense, while his lawyer wanted to present a defense based on lack of intent.And:A landmark Supreme Court decision in 1975, Faretta v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
BARNES, J., concurs with separate opinion. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
" Donald & Barbara Barnes v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:27 am
SexSearch, Barnes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes writes, "Justices Uphold Lethal Injection Procedure. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
By Eric Goldman Mazur v. eBay Inc., 2008 WL 618988 (N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Linda Barnes-Pointer won in McHenry v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:51 pm
" Mordenti v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
Experts on voting rights see the legal battle over Indiana's toughest-in-the-nation voter identification law as the most starkly partisan case to reach the court since Bush v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:39 pm
Barnes, 2007 WL 3050790 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
Coverage of US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Kirsch, Robb and Barnes. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:38 pm
Thus, when Barnes and Davis shot Todd, they were acting in self-defense and, viewed in isolation, the shooting was objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 8:05 pm
Thus, when Barnes and Davis shot Todd, they were acting in self-defense and, viewed in isolation, the shooting was objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
