Search for: "BLAIR v. BLAIR"
Results 541 - 560
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Blair, LLC (D.N.H. 2011). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Blair, LLC (D.N.H. 2011). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
Rejecting the contention, and granting a stay of the judicial proceedings, Blair J held that this reading of section 9 was flawed. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:36 am
Our guests have been great experts in the history and design of libraries, some from the Harvard faculty and others from elsewhere: Matthew Battles, Greg Nagy, Ann Blair, Katherine Park to name just some of those who have already been with us. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm
’” [@ScottKGraham on dissent in Starr v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:11 am
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Walker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
* She also argued, based on United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Blair J. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm
Legislatures can’t entrench laws against amendments by future legislatures (although the government must honor contractual obligations – for a discussion of these issues, see U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm
Legislatures can’t entrench laws against amendments by future legislatures (although the government must honor contractual obligations – for a discussion of these issues, see U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Metz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Duick v. [read post]
