Search for: "Backer v. Backer" Results 541 - 560 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The Circuit Court, in refusing to lift the stay, relied in part on a Supreme Court ruling in April 2009 (Nken v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
I was recently listening to Health Affairs’s “Newsmaker Breakfast with Karen Pollitz. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
s backers might fare on that issue. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
The Wizard and his backers may lose at trial -- and indeed Kitchin J expressed the view that it was improbable that the action would succeed -- but this was Willy's day of triumph. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am by INFORRM
FIO Act 2000, s 43 (prejudicial to commercial interests): Please download: Michael Garrard v IC EA/2009/0107. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:48 am by Josh Wright
The beer sellers are the first competitors of marijuana to officially enter the debate; backers of the initiative are closely watching liquor and wine dealers and the pharmaceutical industry to see if they enter the debate in the remaining weeks. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Prop 8 backers’ appeal is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:16 am by By DEALBOOK
Three of 3Par's earliest backers have reaped about $560 million from the bidding war between Dell and Hewlett-Packard over the data storage company. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:00 am by Glenn Cohen
While Perry and the Prop 8 litigation has been getting most of the attention in the media and blogosphere, the Massachusetts District court decisions in Gill v OPM and Massachusetts v. [read post]