Search for: "Bank 34" Results 541 - 560 of 2,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
By setting aside the dizzying swirl of semantics and considering how members of Congress actually voted on the removal debate, amendments, the bank bill, and other early controversies, one can identify some remarkably consistent through lines that render the entire sequence of events, and the talking points of politicians, less inchoate and more intelligible. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
Eliot Pedrosa (Executive Director, InterAmerican Development Bank)21. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:04 am by Broc Romanek
State of the SEC: A Few Nuggets from the Chair’s Testimony Recently, SEC Chair Jay Clayton delivered this 33-page testimony to the Senate Banking Committee in a hearing about SEC oversight. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Kevin Kaufman
In practice, this tax is mostly levied on foreign banks and petroleum companies. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard Thursday 28 Thursday 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
  Arguably, a better framework is the other nationalist argument implicated by the “let the end be legitimate” passage—the original theory of implied powers, grounded in the Preamble and Sweeping Clause, which received perhaps its most significant early expression in legislative debates over slavery and the First Bank of the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV, heard 4-5 November 2019. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
., 34:15-1, et. seq., Wage and Hour Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a et. seq. and Prevailing Wage Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 et. seq. [read post]
On 20 November 2019, the Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) published a letter, sent to HM Treasury, relating to Article 59 of the revised Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD II). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:40 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
However, under New Jersey Revised Statutes § 2A:34-2, living apart is not a prerequisite if there are other legal reasons for divorce. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:40 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
However, under New Jersey Revised Statutes § 2A:34-2, living apart is not a prerequisite if there are other legal reasons for divorce. [read post]