Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
And in Madison v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
The Act grants the USOC exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” in almost any commercial setting.[7] In 1987, the United States Supreme Court enjoined a California-based athletics company from using the word “Olympics” finding that the Act went beyond normal trademark protections. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Rabinowitz, Ever since Canadian company Bell Media launched its controversial Fair Play initiative, advocating website-blocking, it has received ever intensifying concern from supporters of open media. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
Panera Bread Company, January 5, 2018, Arnold, M.). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
After the federal law expired, several states, including California, enacted their own surcharge bans. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
After the federal law expired, several states, including California, enacted their own surcharge bans. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
***In the Waymo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
COMPANY: Well... we really don't think the outcome of Apple v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
-listed company being hit with a traditional securities lawsuit in 2017 was about 70% higher than the long-term historical average would otherwise suggest. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
***As I often do, I checked out Russell Beck's Fair Competition Law and learned Pennsylvania legislators have proposed a California-style ban on non-competes. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:39 am
Chicago (1949), Cohen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:34 pm
(For more on Kodi and the Amazon ban, see here. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Of note, it's pending in California, which does have a trade-secret "exception" to its non-compete law.Forbes has a long article about a burgeoning dispute between Citrix and Egnyte, one that brings to the fore the difficult procedural question that often arises when employees bolt for a California company but don't live in California.Finally, if you're interested in further reading on an array of subjects, including the Waymo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am
ICOs Banned in China and South Korea. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:10 am
I was very excited to read the teasers about the latest lawsuit against LinkedIn--hiQ Labs v. [read post]
