Search for: "Bar & Restaurant Services, Inc." Results 541 - 560 of 593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Ark Restaurants, 7 FSupp2d 303, 4 WH Cases 2d 1207 (5/19/98). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
§ 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
” Will invalidating civil service appointments of ALJs reach beyond the SEC? [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
(The state also crazily argued that if a shopping mall had a restaurant with a bar, the mall  would need to screen minors before they could enter the mall. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 3, 2009)Denial of state unemployment no bar to federal ADEA retaliation claim Carter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Burns International Services, 406 U.S. 272 (1972). [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and Wheaton College v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Based on that provision, the Patent and Trademark Office barred the registration of THE SLANTS (I use all-caps for this in this post, to follow trademark opinion style), a trademark used by Simon Tam’s Asian American musical group of that name. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Also in the courtroom today are participants in the Supreme Court Summer Institute for Teachers, a joint effort of Streetlaw Inc. and the Supreme Court Historical Society. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bar on 2(e)(4): can’t register a mark something that’s primarily merely a surname. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am by Kristian Soltes
Samsung Sued for Infringing Contactless Payment PatentsLaw Street Media – October 19, 2020 RFCyber Corp. filed a complaint for patent infringement against defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. on Friday in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging that Samsung infringed its contactless payment method via its Samsung Pay service on its mobile devices. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:19 pm by Alex R. McQuade
  The United States’ war against the Islamic State is facing hurdles on and off the battlefield. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Wal-Mart including an analysis of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury published final regulations (“Regulations”) implementing these new rules on December 6, 2012. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
See Footnote 2 The parties agreed to arbitrate their dispute under the rules of JAMS, a provider of alternative dispute resolution services. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” Of the recent High Court rulings, the Nassar decision was the “biggest deal for employers,” according to Chris Bourgeacq, general attorney, labor/HR, for AT&T Services, Inc. in Austin, Texas. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
And the Windsurfing test (Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd [1985] RPC 59 (at 73) was mentioned to see whether the patent is obvious or not. [read post]