Search for: "Beam v. Beam." Results 541 - 560 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2009, 10:06 am
The Texas Legislature attempted to remedy an incorrect decision made by the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Beam v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:56 pm
It was the activist (as well as 100% Republican) Texas Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:32 pm
In Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
For example, where damages are nominal, the Eigth Circuit panel (Melloy, Beam, Gruender) recognized that the multiplier would have to increase. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:32 am
Supreme Court might do the same in their review of Jones v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
Community property is a legal policy creating a presumption that property acquired during a marriage is owned 50/50 by each spouse. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 4:15 pm
Indeed, the three specific sources (gamma rays, x-rays, e-beam) specifically approved by the FDA for food irradiation were approved because they do not make the food radioactive. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Parts I, II, and III of this series provided a literature review and commentary on the history, technology, food safety, and food quality aspects relating to the use of ionizing radiation in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach processing. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 10:28 pm
This patent from Hon Hai Precision and Tsinghua University teaches using III-V nanowire arrays to achieve such microscopy at room temperature. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Introduction Part I and Part II of this series reviewed the historical background and technology of food irradiation, and the food safety implications relating to FDA’s recent approval of a new rule for use of ionizing irradiation as a processing step in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:45 am by M Bates
Nor will I let her attempt to say that Crown prosecutors are somehow victims when defence counsel choose to outwork and thereby outwit them.Consider an example from my first year as a lawyer called R. v. [read post]