Search for: "Benjamin v. Ins*" Results 541 - 560 of 1,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  For example, in the case of Kristen II. v Benjamin JJ., 169 A.D.3d 1176 (3rd Dept. 2019), there was an appeal to change the parenting schedule that had been set out by the trial court. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
Benjamin Franklin once said that he did not have to operate his newspaper as ‘a stagecoach, with seats for everyone. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Bobby Chesney discussed Justice Stephen Breyer’s analysis of the denial of cert in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
#Surprise[Hat Tip: Co-blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The argument drew disagreement from Benjamin Wittes, Andrew Kent and Marty Lederman, which in turn provoked a response by Josh Blackman, who holds views similar to mine. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:14 am by Coleman Saunders
Margaret Taylor summarized the oral arguments from Trump v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
And Patja Howell posted an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes and Bill Galston delve into populism—at home and abroad: And that was the week that was. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Well, Tatintsian v Pryor Cashman LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 33152(U)  December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 152022/2017  Judge: David Benjamin Cohen describes the current state of affairs. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
 The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:21 pm
He highlighted how, not only is the DMCA "more broken than ever", but also how the original intention of Congress has been defeated by the actual application of the law by courts (in Perfect 10 v CCBill, Viacom v YouTube, UMG v Shelter, and Capitol v Vimeo): instead of having service providers and copyright owners working together to prevent online piracy, the DMCA has turned into a notice-and-takedown regime where copyright owners have to do… [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:13 am by Coleman Saunders
Nathaniel Sobel analyzed the recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case Commonwealth v. [read post]