Search for: "Billings v. Smith"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm
The decision in Prior v QUT was not entirely surprising in light of the facts and the law. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:29 am
Supreme Court on July 26 issued its judgment in the case of Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:22 am
Selected federal documents below from Gallery Watch.com may include references to government reporrts, Congressional letters, draft bills, and other primary source materials. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002] [defendant could be… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Does any location information appear on a person’s bill? [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Fenner andamp;andnbsp; Smith, 906 F. 2d 1206, 121 14 (8th Cir. 1990); andnbsp;Biggans v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:53 pm
Smith – is unconvincing. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:40 am
In William Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Under Sherbert v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:22 am
This would be the third such inquiry, with the Baha Mousa Inquiry nearly concluded and the Al-Swaedy Inquiry starting soon. 1 July | UK Supreme Court Decides R (Smith) v SSD « EJIL – We have posted on this important Supreme Court decision, most recently here. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:30 am
” Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Odom v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm
Therefore, in Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Lionel Bently (Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property at the University of Cambridge) and Dr Reinhard Oertli (Meyerlustenberger Lachenal, Switzerland) on the repealing of section 52 – should it stay, or should it go? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:13 am
In a tremendous step forward for our right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 6:57 am
After all, the "State" in "State v. [read post]
