Search for: "Bishop v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am
Church and State On Friday, the House of Commons Library published a research briefing on The relationship between church and state in the United Kingdom written by David Torrance. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
The Bill, which was introduced by the Government at the request of the Church of England, aims to increase the number of women bishops in the Lords by extending the period in which vacancies among the Lords Spiritual are to be filled by bishops who are women until 2030. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Catholic Bishop of Chicago. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:29 am
See, e.g., my article The Bishops and the Corporate Stakeholder Debate (April 2002). [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The Board here was correct in finding broadcast-incidental copying engages the reproduction right, consistent with Bishop v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
” Redwing v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
” Redwing v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Hein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Citing Walsh Bishop Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
Judicial Watch obtained the documents pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on January 3, 2011 (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:32 am
(See INS v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
Readers may recall that in December 2023 the Carlisle CNC was similarly unable to reach the level of consensus required to nominate a new Diocesan Bishop. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
Maryland v. [read post]
