Search for: "Board of Review v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Australia's National Innovation Review report: Ventureaustralia - venture capital and the value of IP? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Ross Valley Sanitary District, PSI , 2024 Cal. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
’ – 18 – 22 June, US/Alaska: (Public Knowledge), Center for IP 8th Annual IP Symposium – 28-30 May, Maryland US: (Public Knowledge), University of Maastricht: Conference on public health, innovation and intellectual property – 15 April, Maastricht (Netherlands): (IPR-Helpdesk), NLSIU Symposium: ‘Challenges to India’s patent regime’ – 12-13 April: (Spicy IP), Anti-counterfeiting and brand… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Exxon raises an issue of first impression about punitive damages in maritime law, which falls within a federal court's jurisdiction to decide in the manner of a common law court, subject to the authority of Congress to legislate otherwise if it disagrees with the judicial result. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm
Second, on November 15, 2017, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued a decision in Whitehall v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The Act authorizes the governor to certify certain projects as "environmental leadership development projects" and it creates procedures for streamlining judicial review of these projects. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm
Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Lee, 15-446, would interest only Kooks: The case presents two specialized questions involving the standards applied by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (PTAB) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and whether a court of appeals can review the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR proceeding. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Board enforced the regulation against a physician who did not possess the required specialty board certification. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
Second, on November 15, 2017, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued a decision in Whitehall v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), Amy Rosen reports that the court “said Monday it would not review a Second Circuit dismissal of a lawsuit by two former Sprint executives who had alleged the Internal Revenue Service and [Ernst & Young] concealed evidence of an investigation into tax shelters. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 2014). [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Spicy IP), Aspen pays £170M for IP rights to Eltroxin, Imuran, Lanoxin and Zyloric: (Afro-IP), Year after settling global patent feud over smallpox vaccine, Barvarian Nordic sues Oxford BioMedica over patents related to same virus: (IP Law360), Australia: Age reports former GSK executive’s victory in court action brought by GSK alleging he started a competing business using GSK’s confidential information: (IPwar’s), Brazil: ANVISA to review… [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Labour Law: Grievances; PrivacyYork Region District School Board v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Department of Health, Board of Psychology, 816 So. 2d 701, 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), however, the First District Court of Appeal held that the statute is unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
The arguments presented in court are subject to judicial orders and judicial discretion. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Morgan, No. 06-5726 Denial of a petition for habeas corpus seeking to overturn a conviction for murder and attempted rape, based on evidence discovered subsequent to trial that implicated another person, is reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded where the district court committed reversible error by not reviewing the entire trial record during its review of the habeas petition, and a motion to expand the record should have been granted. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
The Appeal In a split decision, the Third District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order. [read post]
