Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 10,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Academics, practitioners and legal reform groups have long criticised PAL as both appallingly unclear and manifestly unfair, which has now culminated in a clear indication that the Court felt duty-bound to clarify the law. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:06 am by Sandy
All state courts will be bound by this precedent. [read post]