Search for: "Brewer v. Case" Results 541 - 560 of 599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by Douglas Reiser
Brewer signed into law a bill establishing retainage and final-payment timetables for properly completed construction work. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
Representative Publications: Brewer, Scott. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Overseas mail took a long time to reach its destination and, in the case of letter sent to French law firms in early August, even longer to be read. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
After considering the plaintiff’s case, the review board upheld CMS’s demand for $25,868.58. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:07 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
But that's a different story.The question that the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Cavallaro and Stephanie Erin Brewer, here; Christina M. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:33 am by lawmrh
Fried, the court found “Mervin Fried, of Kingman, acquitted in pitchfork trespass case. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
Introduction In 2007, in response to the public's anger about the high cost of gasoline after the hurricane disasters, the House of Representatives drafted and passed the Federal Price Gouging Prevention Act ("FPGPA"), which reads in part: "It shall be unlawful for any person to sell…during a period of an energy emergency, gasoline…at a price that (A) is unconscionably excessive; and… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
In many if not most of these cases, the pre-amendment provision retains at least some of the protections found in Section 417 (b)’s default rule against adverse impact on the non-consenting members, as illustrated in a case decided earlier this year called Gallagher v Crotty. [read post]