Search for: "Brown v. Marshall" Results 541 - 560 of 615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Brennan arrived after the Court’s landmark Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The modern version of the committee confirmation process, with senators pressing nominees on their judicial views, started in 1955 when southern Dixiecrats wanted to grill John Marshall Harlan about his view of the court’s decision the previous year striking down school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Brown, University of Maryland, “Incommensurable Subjects: Patriots, Traitors, and the African American Literary Tradition”Courtney Marshall, University of New Hampshire, “Law, Literature, and the Construction of a Black Female Subject: Zora Neale Hurston as Legal Storyteller”Kevin Maillard, Syracuse University College of Law, “A Preposterous Story: Interracial Pretext in Faulkner and Chesnutt” Panel 4: Literature, Law, and Genre/Form, Rm. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
  As Chief Justice Margaret Marshall explained on behalf of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Goodridge v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
Ogden Chief Justice Marshall had written that the Clause empowered Congress to lay down the rule by which commerce (not persons in commerce) could be regulated. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
When President Biden’s nominee for U.S. attorney general Merrick Garland begins his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, the U.S. government will reach a critical inflection point. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
” Beyond the individual clauses and their interpretation—but way, way short of some ethereal Dworkinian principle—there’s the constitutional structure and its logic (or “genius,” as John Marshall used to say). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Brennan or Earl Warren, but, rather, John Marshall Harlan, who on notable occasions, including the reapportionment cases, dissented from quintessential “Warren Court” decisions. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]