Search for: "Bruce Schneier"
Results 541 - 560
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 9:59 am
In the spring and summer, Hawley answered security guru Bruce Schneier's questions in a series of email interviews. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 8:57 pm
It’s probably impossible to get too much of Bruce Schneier, although I honestly wouldn’t mind if he stopped Friday Squid Blogging. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:53 am
Bruce Schneier explains What Our Top Spy Doesn't Get: Security and Privacy Aren't Opposites ... [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:15 am
Norbert Wiener Award winner Bruce Schneier points us to a new 117-page paper by Ronald C. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
Bruce Schneier has written an eloquent column over at wired.com on the false dichotomy between security and privacy: The debate isn't security versus privacy. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:09 pm
As if that weren't enough, CPSR president Annalee Newitz -- she of the Sarah Connor Chronicles' boosting io9.com -- will deliver the opening remarks, seconds before nmap-author and GoDaddy victim Fyodor Vaskovich takes the podium to hit Bruce Schneier with a Norbert Wiener Award. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:31 pm
On Tuesday I blogged about the ethics of "stealing" WiFi (see here), so I was interested to read today that Bruce Schneier of Wired's Security Matters blog, looks at whether you should leave your own Wi-Fi open, and says why not ... after all, you can steal his WiFi: Whenever I talk or write about my own security setup, the one thing that surprises people -- and attracts the most criticism -- is the fact that I run an open wireless network at home. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 5:02 am
Since I first read Bruce Schneier's books, particularly Beyond Fear, I've come to believe that the world of computer security offers tremendously valuable lessons for maintaining public safety and security in the real world, particularly with its focus on preventing and/or minimizing harm instead of only reacting to harmful agents after the fact.In that vein, a terrific article in ComputerWorld ("Do surveillance cameras detect criminals or deter crime? [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 8:42 pm
Bruce Schneier links to a campaign that wants people to tell politicians to stop being afraid. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:36 pm
The researchers found that access to the PEB memory itself is not protected by encryption or passwords, although some of the data stored on the PEB is encrypted (using Bruce Schneier's Blowfish cipher -- note to Bruce to add the ES&S machine to your Blowfish products page). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:39 am
Wired - “How Does Bruce Schneier Protect His Laptop Data? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:11 am
HOW SECURITY WHIZ BRUCE SCHNEIER protects his laptop data. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:19 pm
Over at Bruce Schneier's blog there's a reference to a paper that includes the criticism of security efforts that "Most 'security' efforts are designed to stop yesterday's attacks but fail completely to stop tomorrow's attacks and are of no use in building invulnerable software. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:55 am
A wrong-headed reliance on citizen informants to combat the war on terror may have the unintended side effect of enforcing uniformity and cultural rigidity, says security guru Bruce Schneier, thanks to an unholy combination of media hype, unreliable informants, and bureaucratic CYA. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:48 am
Dealing with the US in particular, the article is based on a blog post by Bruce Schneier, a prominent computer security expert, on mobile phone jamming. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
" Obviously the man does not read THREAT LEVEL, Bruce Schneier or Boing Boing. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:29 pm
Schneier on Security: The War on the Unexpected The War on the Unexpected We've opened up a new front on the war on terror. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 3:54 pm
Wonderful news from Bruce Schneier. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Over at Schneier on Security, Bruce Schneier has a thoughtful post about the ills of overreactions in the name of national security: We've opened up a new front on the war on terror. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
1. [read post]
