Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 541 - 560
of 62,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2020, 6:58 am
Pennsylvania and in Barr, Att’y Gen. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:20 am
Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (Case C-495/07); WLR(D) 6 “Where the proprietor of a trade mark affixed the mark to items that it gave free of charge to purchasers of its goods, it did not make genuine use of the mark so far as those items were concerned, for the purpose of, inter alia, art [...] [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
JD Wetherspoon plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Case C-302/07); [2009] WLR(D) 84 “Traders who priced individual goods on a VAT-inclusive basis were not entitled to claim the same right to round down VAT for each transaction that was granted to traders who priced goods exclusive of VAT and added VAT at the moment of invoicing. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’ in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Oxfam v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] EWHC 3078 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 348 "The VAT & Duties Tribunal had jurisdiction under s 83(1)(c) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 to determine an appeal concerning recovery of input value added tax where the claim was based upon public law principles and the doctrine of legitimate [...] [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:24 am
As reported here at C|Net’s News.com and here at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments tomorrow (Tuesday, November 28th) for KSR v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
European Commission v Italian Republic (Case C-565/08); [2011] WLR (D) 118 “Mandatory national provisions obliging lawyers to comply with maximum tariffs, in all cases where there was no conditional fee agreement or no special agreement between lawyer and client, were not contrary to articles 43EC and 49EC of the EC Treaty. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:38 am
., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Elmi: [2011] EWCA Civ 1403; [2011] WLR (D) 353 “A person from abroad who had ticked a form at a job centre to confirm she was seeking work and then applied for income support satisfied the requirement in article 7(3)(c) of the Citizens Direction that she was registered as a job seeker and was entitled to income support.” WLR Daily, 18th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2564 In re the marriage of: Ar-Rahmaan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:31 am
In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, a decision finding that debtors were permitted under 11 U.S.C. section 1325(a)(5)(C) to surrender a car, financed by appellant, in full satisfaction of the debt, is reversed pursuant to the court's ruling in Capital One Auto Finance v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Holloway v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:51 am
Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Case C-337/10); [2012] WLR (D) 137 “The provisions of article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC, concerning an employee’s entitlement to annual leave and an allowance in lieu where the employment relationship was terminated, applied to a public servant carrying out the activities of a fireman in normal circumstances.” WLR Daily, 3rd May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
Vicente Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA; Case C-277/08 Court of Justice of the European Communities “National provisions or collective agreements which provided that a worker who was sick during a period of scheduled annual leave did not have the right, after his recovery, to take his annual leave at another time were unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
., Elizabeth C. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:52 am
Aventis Pasteur SA v OB (Case C-358/08); [2009] WLR (D) 352 ”The Community Directive on liability for defective products normally precluded a producer of a product from being substituted, after the expiry of the 10-year limitation period, for a defendant who had been sued within that period. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:12 am
POLLACK, DONALD C. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:48 am
The case is C-127/08 Metock and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and the judgment was handed down on July 25th 2008. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
