Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am
Their first joint complaint was dismissed by Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, but without prejudice, and the plaintiffs brought an amended complaint. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:49 am
Young v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:55 am
Compel arbitration in California state court (applying both federal and California law). [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm
A 2020 securities suit filing total lower than the totals in the last three years would be welcomed by the D&O insurance industry; however, a relatively lower year-end total that would still be well above historical levels is unlikely to have a significant impact on how D&O insurers perceive the level of securities litigation risk. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am
The NBAM initially covered eight states, but now includes 22 states total: California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:55 am
Shimonry, and (v) Ms. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Mavrix involved celebrity photos, and the defendant there ran a website that focused on the “California-centered celebrity and entertainment industries. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm
Case date: 24 July 2020 Case number: No. 20-15014 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
This is typically the case with overseas companies beyond the reach of US courts. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
The ABC Test of Employee Misclassification The 2019 law was designed to codify a 2018 California Supreme Court ruling, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm
State Expense Reimbursement Laws California, Cal. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
District Court for the Southern District of California shows the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in January issued a subpoena to the California Bureau of Cannabis Control for records pertaining to cannabis companies and owners. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
