Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:42 am
A North Carolina Filmmaker Continues to Challenge State Sovereign Immunity — Litigation in Allen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm
This Ibero-American Convention conceives videoconferencing as a resource that enhances and expedites cooperation between the competent authorities of the signatory States. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:39 am
The contention that the free standing Fourth Amendment claim was decided wrongly by state courts is barred under Stone v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:23 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 10:07 pm
In Brooks v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
-China Trade Talks, Encircling the United States). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:22 pm
In the case captioned Alegria v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
The crux of a Title VII inquiry is “the reason for a particular employment decision,” Cooper v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
Cooper Cameron Corp (Fed. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Blake Cooper, a Reno County public defender, won in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
