Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 9:28 am
Non-IAEA (PC 10452 v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:28 am
Non-IAEA (PC 10452 v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:28 am
Non-IAEA (PC 10452 v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:35 am
"Finally, those of use who follow Apple v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
That's what the SSNIP test (Small but Significant Non-transitory Increase in Price)--as in Epic v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
Bias v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
One of the most well-known examples occurred in Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Nursing Homes: PATIENTS SUFFER SUB-PAR CARE AT CALIFORNIA FACILITIES, CLASS ACTION SAYS, Valentine v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:05 am
See Mazza, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:27 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm
More precisely, the CTR filing requirement applies to purchases (i) in Manhattan and Miami; (ii) by a partnership, corporation, LLC or other legal entity; (iii) for a purchase price over the respective threshold amounts; (iv) made without external financing; and (v) where payment is made “using currency or a cashier’s check, a certified check, a traveler’s check, or money order in any form. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
We've been following this TSMC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
Santa Clara County, in which the company seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision holding that health care providers can sue for Astra’s violation of contractual price limitations. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denying Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Sam- sung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:41 am
CBS Corp., January 15, 2020, Caproni, V.).The complaint alleges that Moonves—who was heralded as the architect of CBS’s success while overseeing a dramatic rise in share price during his more than 20-year tenure at the firm—concealed a dark history of sexual misconduct and fostered a hostile workplace culture that posed material business risks to the company. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
City of Sacramento, California v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:19 am
Tonkovic, J.D.The district court sitting in California's Northern District has sent yet another case alleging only claims under the Securities Act back to the state court from which it originated. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
The appellate court held that California’s Civil Code section 2527(c), which requires mining companies to disclose pharmacy data (and, in particular, prices charged to private customers) to third-party payers, is lawful under the First Amendment. [read post]
