Search for: "California Department of Fair Employment and Housing" Results 541 - 560 of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employees in California may bring claims of discrimination and retaliation pursuant to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm by Mike
Candee asserts a number of claims including disability discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 6:40 am by Nassiri Law
States Can Enact Stronger Transgender Worker Protections Whatever the SCOTUS decides, it should not impact the protections in place for transgender and LGB workers in California, which are stronger under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Lynberg & Watkins
 To read Part One, click here.In the context of employment litigation, California employers are most frequently faced with employees or former employees claiming violations of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act’s prohibitions on discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
In-house collection departments are not generally included under the act. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:37 am by Eugene Lee
This is particularly true given that strict filing deadlines apply (180 days to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and 1 year to file a charge with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing). [read post]
With the enactment of AB 9, under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), the current statute of limitations for bringing an administrative charge to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (which is a condition of filing a lawsuit) was one year from the date of the alleged employment discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. [read post]
With the enactment of AB 9, under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), the current statute of limitations for bringing an administrative charge to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (which is a condition of filing a lawsuit) was one year from the date of the alleged employment discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm by AALRR
  As we previously reported here, in a press released issued September 12, 2011, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing touts an administrative award of $846,300 against an employer for allegedly failing to accommodate an employee's medical condition and for allegedly terminating the employee "relying on [an] insufficient travel pretext. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:44 am by Mike
 Her employer fired her from her mall store manager position and she sued under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act for disability discrimination. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:53 pm
  In Westrec, an employee filed a charge of discrimination against Westrec with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) and requested an immediate right to sue letter. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:48 am by Amanda D. Haverstick
  A June 23, 2014 White House memorandum to all executive department and agency heads directs that, within 120 days, procedures must be in place to provide employees with an ability to request “work schedule flexibilities,” including telework, part-time employment, or job sharing. [read post]
Although Guidance issued by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (as well as the federal EEOC) appears to permit employers to require employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of employment, subject to certain considerations and necessary accommodations, other state and/or federal laws (such as the federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act) may prove obstacles to such mandates. [read post]
Although Guidance issued by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (as well as the federal EEOC) appears to permit employers to require employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of employment, subject to certain considerations and necessary accommodations, other state and/or federal laws (such as the federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act) may prove obstacles to such mandates. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A jury will decide whether a university’s decision to require a professor to undergo a mental fitness-for-duty examination was job-related and consistent with business necessity, and thus lawful under the Rehabilitation Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 8:28 am by Howard Friedman
City of Stockton, California, (9th Cir., Aug. 4, 2023), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a religious discrimination suit under Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act brought by the city's former Fire Chief. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:14 am by David DePaolo
Enriquez thus argued that her receipt of work comp made her an employee under the law.The court rejected this analysis noting that different laws have different impacts on employment status under different factual settings and in this case the fact of receipt of work comp benefits did not convey on Enriquez employee status for purposes of the Fair Employment and Housing Act.The Second District quoted the recent case of Estrada v. [read post]