Search for: "California v. American Stores" Results 541 - 560 of 803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 2:51 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
(Although TSA promises that travelers’ faces are obscured by the software and that the body scans are not stored, the machines are capable of saving and transmitting the images. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Jeff Richardson
With creativity and passion, they’ve made us a stronger, more innovative American company. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In California, the public accommodations law led to the end of a ladies’ discount at a car wash in Koire v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Alan Friel
However, in compiling consumer profiles upon which to base dynamic pricing models, e-commerce operators should be cognizant of anti-discrimination laws, such as California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act[3] (the Unruh Act). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright)   Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango)   China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon)   Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am by David Kravets
That’s why we have used bookstores, record stores, GameStop and even eBay. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Metropolitan Opera, 841 N.E.2d 747, 749 (N.Y. 2005); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]