Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 541 - 560
of 6,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
The California Court of Appeals explored the issue of the responsibility of an insurance agent is the case of Williams v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
In Alkhas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Feb. 19, 2021) the district court’s ruling [pdf] Related posts: Amazon Can’t Force Arbitration of Minors’ Privacy Claims Based on Alexa Recordings–BF v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 12:13 pm
Haney v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:36 am
Reznik v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 6:26 am
The court in Golden v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:11 am
In First National v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Case Name: Yvonne Fowkes v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
There are about a million California cases that say that theft is a lesser included offense of robbery. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:45 am
On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear argument in Costco Wholesale v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:54 am
Here is the unpublished opinion in Fernandez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
See, e.g., Sargent v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
In sum, no California court decision, statute, or regulation governs bonus overtime, the DLSE Manual sections on the subject do not have the force of law, and the DLSE advice letters on the subject are not on point. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 am
Like Sifuentes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
LEXIS 6073 (CD CA, Jan. 19, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed with leave to amend a Jehovah's Witness inmate's complaint that he was forced to attend an educational class that violated his beliefs. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
In an unexpected -- and somewhat embarrassing -- way.It's one of the many recent cases that's forced to navigate around the various new cases and statutes that govern LWOP sentences given to minors. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
The fact that a clerk made a (reversible) mistake doesn't justify forcing Doe to make everything public at this point. [read post]