Search for: "California v. Marks" Results 541 - 560 of 4,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am by Stewart Baker, Bryce Klehm
And TOLA represents a high-water mark for those efforts. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, federal law protects labor-related speech (for or against) in private workplaces, without protecting other speech.[235] The California Supreme Court concluded that a similar California statute allowing labor-related picketing on private property (but not other picketing) was constitutional,[236] though the D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
Since 2012, only one other justice has achieved that 95% mark in divided cases: Roberts, last term. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:39 am by Amy Howe
The 6-3 ruling in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Flomenhaft v Finkelstein (127 AD3d 634, 637 [1st Dept 2015] [test of pertinence is “extremely liberal”] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:46 am by Tom Smith
City of New London, which the Court appropriately marked with a decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]