Search for: "California v. Woods" Results 541 - 560 of 594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Woods (December 4, 2008) ___Cal.App.4th___, Second Appellate District No. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Woods, No. 07-51491 In an appeal of a sentence for distributing crack cocaine, imposition of a supervised-release condition forbidding defendant from residing with any person to whom she was not ceremonially married or related by blood is vacated where the condition was overbroad and involved a greater deprivation of liberty than was reasonably necessary to achieve sentencing purposes. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
McGuire Woods published New Major Decision Holds California Meal Period, Rest Period, Off-The-Clock And "Time Shaving" Wage Claims "Not Amenable To Class Treatment" Seyfarth Shaw wrote: Court Provides Better Meal Deal For California Employers If  we didn't include your blog or firm alert on this list, you need to read up on Google's search algorithms. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:10 am
funding for programs for inmate mothers (but not fathers) upheld: That's the California Court of Appeal's decision in Woods v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:10 am
funding for programs for inmate mothers (but not fathers) upheld: That's the California Court of Appeal's decision in Woods v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861, 869 (2000), and applied that principle in our neck of the woods in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
  I think we can now officially say that Justice Scalia is, historically speaking, delusional.His recent Giles v. [read post]