Search for: "Cambridge Who's Who Publishers"
Results 541 - 560
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
Thanks to Al Brophy's train-spotting abilities**, I was alerted a week or so ago to a new paper by Brooklyn Law School's Minna Kotkin. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:01 pm
At issue was a piece published in the Harvard Law Review's annual April Fool's Day issue, the Harvard Law Revue, in 1992, just a year after Obama, who'd been editor of the Law Review, graduated. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:50 pm
At the time of writing this blog entry I am part way through the E's so I have quite a lot of work still to do! [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 10:35 pm
BBC News reported yesterday that the British government will fund creation of a group of scholars, to be hosted by Oxford and Cambridge Universities, who will examine issues relating to Islam's role in Britain and the obligations of Muslims as British citizens. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 10:35 pm
BBC News reported yesterday that the British government will fund creation of a group of scholars, to be hosted by Oxford and Cambridge Universities, who will examine issues relating to Islam's role in Britain and the obligations of Muslims as British citizens. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:51 am
Working was published in 1999, and the book's chapterisation is in terms of issues, themes, and events. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:24 pm
An impressive list of world-class libraries and book publishers don't seem to mind. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:47 pm
Martin Monti of the Medical Research Council's Cognition and Brain Science Unit in Cambridge said that his work might have implications for the medical diagnosis of people in a vegetative state, and for determining whether to discontinue feeding. [read post]
29 May 2008, 8:23 am
(Not available online, but I've seen copies recently at Carmichael's Bookstore in Louisville) and Joseph-Beth Booksellers in Lexington). [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:56 pm
We don't share Professor Horwitz's shyness. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:59 am
" As Peter points out, Georgia State's percentage is based on "the state's guide to understanding copyright - developed by a committee of experienced lawyers and educators. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Spicy IP), US: Who’s to blame for rising drug prices? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, (IMPACT), USPTO launches First Action Interview Pilot Program: (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Baristas), (Patently-O), (Patent Docs), (IP Spotlight), (Anticipate This!) [read post]
CANADA - Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
The same newspaper subsequently published an editorial entitled "Exactly how often do sex offenders reoffend? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
" According to the company's website, your paper will be compared to 15 million (or 40 million, depending on who you believe) papers that Turnitin already has on file. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:32 am
Turkey's choice also has international ramifications. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 10:01 pm
Scurlock's follow up print work: "Maxed Out: Hard Times, Easy Credit and the Era of Predatory Lenders" was published last year and further highlights the dilemma of pervasive debt in our society. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:38 pm
The ISP-based internet filtering plan has drawn the ire of privacy advocates who claim the government is delving into internet censorship while the nation's largest ISP, Telstra BigPond, says parents should be solely responsible for their children's internet activities. [read post]
