Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 541 - 560
of 51,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 5:55 am
Those cases are Rogoz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm
One of the many people who have seen their complaints about bad journalism in the national press swept aside is taking his case against the sham press regulator, IPSO, to the High Court. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
As previously noted on Inforrm, the Supreme Court has dismissed (by a majority of 5-2) the appeal in Khuja v Times Newspapers and others [2017] UKSC 49, an important case dealing with the interaction between privacy, the open justice principle and the right to report on judicial proceedings. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Denton, and FTC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Thomas, the court in the case of People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:17 am
Case citation: Watkins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:38 pm
See what you think about this one.The backpack in the car almost certainly belonged to one of the three people in the vehicle. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
Everything's affirmed.But nonetheless and unusual case. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
This comports with the recent Illinois Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
That's good enough for a stop.A tough case. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
It may well be -- as the Court of Appeal holds -- that a criminal court doesn't have the statutory power to enter a restraining order in an extortion case, unlike some other criminal cases (e.g., stalking, domestic violence, etc.).However, if that's indeed the case, the law should be changed.Defendant tries to extort a job from someone by threatening him. [read post]
5 May 2019, 6:25 pm
Forced blood draw of probationer suspected of DUI does not violate the Fourth Amendment The People, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
The pro se Maryland case, UMG Recordings v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
They definitely adopt different perspectives on the exact same case, which is always interesting. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Ferguson, No. 145127, in abeyance because it believed that the cases of People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 am
The ruling in the case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
With that said, his post speculating on how the brand new SCOTUS case Arizona v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Such was the case in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Cases that so hold are legion.But apparently not in DUI cases. [read post]
