Search for: "Church v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 5,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
Jennings, which transferred state-owned churches from Congregationalists to Unitarians, they were functionally the state church of Massachusetts until disestablishment. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm by David Greene
One of the many ways EFF is fighting illegal NSA spying is in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm by Amy Howe
After the Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 am
Supreme Court seeking review of the 6th Circuit's December decision in Living Water Church of God v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
” Police chief Mike Rowland is quoted as saying the program “doesn’t violate separation of church and state issues because it allows the offender to choose church or jail ... and the church of their choice,” but that’s a parody of the concept of “choice” — again, one might as well say that a law that tells everyone, “go to church every week or you’ll go to jail” is constitutional because… [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:04 am
Esbeck, Univ. of Missouri, has posted a new article, The 60th Anniversary of the Everson Decision and America's Church-State Proposition. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter on the thread about the 1901 case in which the court rejected (on statutory grounds) a prosecution for expelling someone from church based on how he voted writes: It goes almost without saying that religious freedom was not at issue in this case because the First Amendment would not be incorporated against the states until Gitlow v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:00 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today denied review in Trustees of New Life In Christ Church v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 am by Paul Horwitz
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hill Country and Covered Bridge were residential neighborhood associations in the area surrounding the Church’s construction site, and both opposed the Church’s request to build an outdoor amphitheater, arguing that the Church’s proposed amphitheater would be used for outdoor entertainment events, including live music performances, concerts, ballets, graduations, and theatrical performances. [read post]