Search for: "Clara Doe"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 am
The purpose of the series will be to answer some basic questions about traffic safety in Santa Clara County, including San Jose and the outlying suburbs. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:42 am
These issues could be discussed through the following questions: How does the IACtHR understand the concept of democracy? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:51 pm
Some of these programs may improve urban life, and EFF does not oppose smart cities per se. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
The text of the remedy, found in Section 1836(b)(2), is so long and detailed that one must think think it adds a very heavy substantive and procedural layer of protection that the law otherwise does not afford. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:25 am
Apple, Inc. was filed in state court in Santa Clara, California where Apple is headquartered. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 3:33 am
” Does Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
(For more on NCAs, see my article with Professor Elizabeth Rowe to be published by the Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal later this year.) [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Smith’s Response to DUI Claims After exiting the Santa Clara jail, Smith apologized for these incidents but denied being under the influence when the accident occurred. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Donald Trump, owner of all but the smallest sliver of the privately held company, has said while the law does not require it, he is formulating plans to remove himself from the company’s operations. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:02 am
The Santa Clara Law High Tech Law Institute and the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office host High Tech, Trade Secrets and The Defense of Trade Secrets Act: Does DTSA Change the Game? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 3:10 pm
In particular, Santa Clara County Superior Court allows for these petitions to be heard ex parte (which essentially means there is a minimal waiting period for the case to be heard by the judge) and does not hyper-scrutinize the evidence needed to have the petition be granted. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:22 am
For example, the City of Santa Clara’s minimum wage will be $11.10 per hour, effective January 1, 2017. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
But tougher grading by the bar does not account for the significant drop in the California pass rate in recent years. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am
The university does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy), age, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, personal appearance, gender identity and expression, family responsibilities, political affiliation, source of income, veteran status, an individual’s genetic information or any other bases under federal or local laws (collectively “Protected Bases”) in its programs and activities. [read post]
Ruminations 66/Democracy Part 37: "Las Ideas no se Matan;" Thoughts on the Death of Fidel Castro Ruz
26 Nov 2016, 8:27 pm
One does not think and then do--one does and them thinks. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 10:46 am
Clara Hendrickson alerted readers to a new episode of the Chess Clock Debates, featuring Dan Byman and David Luban on whether there is a duty to serve in government under Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:55 am
Tina Wann (hro@netsimco.com) Applicants must be able to work in the United States. 2017 Clara Barton International Humanitarian Law Competition The Clara Barton Competition Committee, Georgetown University Law Center, and the Canadian and American Red Cross are excited to announce the 4th Annual Clara Barton International Humanitarian Law Competition, to be held March 10-12, 2017 in Washington D.C, at the Georgetown… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:52 am
The university does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy), age, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, personal appearance, gender identity and expression, family responsibilities, political affiliation, source of income, veteran status, an individual’s genetic information or any other bases under federal or local laws (collectively “Protected Bases”) in its programs and activities. [read post]
