Search for: "Clarke v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and now the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm by Hadley Baker
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance:  The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Donald Clarke looks at Animal Science Products v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]