Search for: "Clemente v. Clemente"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 4:28 am
Judge Jolly wrote one dissent, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, DeMoss, Clement, and Owen, asserting that the EEOC failed to proffer a basis for inferring discriminatory intent based on the employee’s gender. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
., Josh Blackman, McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:39 am
– Erin Murphy, my immensely talented co-clerk and “protege of former Solicitor General Paul Clement” will be arguing McCutcheon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm
This sudden reversal in Arizona is all the more unexpected in light of the fact that it was originally Brewer’s opposition to Obamacare that may have back the government into a corner where it could not win on the Medicaid issue in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:58 am
According to the Los Angeles Times, Nick was a highly regarded high school athlete at San Clemente High School. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:48 am
Clement v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
Smart.Except the Court of Appeal holds that San Clemente can't do that. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Most Volokh readers know that, and the Fifth Circuit holds (following Smith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
From 2002 to 2007, he served as an Assistant to the Solicitor General under both Ted Olson and Paul Clement. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
(Similar concerns surrounded the use of ancestry in Rice v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:53 am
I wrote, in "Factual Causation in Negligence After Clements", 2013 41 Adv Q 179 that Clements would create problems in but-for jurisprudence. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Moreno, Cleburne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Contracting Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Contracting Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:32 am
(E.g., Paul Clement: "And if you want to see the problems with their position, look at Joint Appendix page 437. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Then, in 2012, in Clements v. [read post]
