Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 541 - 560 of 1,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
          In Matter of Michael R v Amanda R, ___AD3d___, 2019 WL 4264401 (1stDept., 2019) the first and only day of trial on the father’s enforcement petition took place on February 2, 2016 before the Support Magistrate. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ripa v Petrosyants  2019 NY Slip Op 32638(U) August 15, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 510658/17 restates the age old principle that one may not successfully sue an attorney unless there was an attorney-client relationship, or something very, very close to it. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
The Obligation of Care Largely Mirrors FINRA’s “Suitability” Rule Reg BI’s obligation of care closely resembles the suitability standard of FINRA Rule 2111. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
The Obligation of Care Largely Mirrors FINRA’s “Suitability” Rule Reg BI’s obligation of care closely resembles the suitability standard of FINRA Rule 2111. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Yet, NMM and Roberts facilitated the consummation of the closing. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pinto-Bedoya v Yacoob  2019 NY Slip Op 51332(U)  Decided on August 14, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County  Rivera, J. is the ridiculous story of how some individuals were conned into getting involved in a mortgage fraud ring. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
” Illinois Court Finds Ongoing Fiduciary Duty in Decision Reviving Minority Shareholder’s Suit to Invalidate Settlement Agreement Notwithstanding Release and Non-Reliance Provision Arndt v Nardulli, 2018 IL App (1st) 173044-U [Ill. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
" This argument closely resembles the briefing in the Emoluments Clauses cases. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]