Search for: "Coats v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A 54(2), the… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
See Gordon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
Editions authorized for sale in the United States are of the highest quality, and are printed with strong, hard-cover bindings with glossy protective coatings. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
Conte v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:48 am
Hatch (pictured), Saxby Chambliss, Dan Coats,... [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:23 am
According to the Northern District of California in Scandlon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
National Lead Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:44 am
Coats. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:26 pm
The case of Veronese v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
A 1994, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Celtic Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Coates v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
The specifications in the contract stated the type of coating for the pipes, being an Enamel Coal Tar Coating in accordance with a particular industry standard. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In this ruling, in Nelson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
The federal district court hearing the case agreed with the ASM to conditional certify the overtime case as a collective action pursuant to the United States Supreme Court case Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:10 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:42 am
In Magsil Corp., et al. v. [read post]
